12 Ways to Get More Reviews This Quarter

Twelve ways to get more reviews this quarter, ordered by effort against return, including the four most stores skip and the one that changes coverage.

The Brandfeel Team
Published: September 21, 2026Updated: September 21, 2026
An eye-level view tight along a pale retail shelf edge under cool even lighting, with printed label strips seated in the shelf channel and three empty channel sections where no label has been seated
Quick Answer

You can get more reviews this quarter by fixing when you ask, asking for less, and pointing the requests at products that have none. Those three changes cost nothing and usually move volume more than any incentive. The twelve tactics below are ordered by effort against return, starting with a one-off request to the delivered orders that were never asked, which is the largest single win most stores have available. The target worth chasing is coverage rather than total volume: the share of your catalogue carrying enough reviews to be useful on its own product page. A store with forty thousand reviews concentrated on nine products has a review problem that its headline number hides.

Key Takeaways
  • Coverage beats volume: five reviews on forty products is worth more than a hundred more on one.
  • The largest quarter-one win is usually a one-off request to past customers who were never asked.
  • Ask after the product has been used, not after it has been delivered.
  • Every extra field in the form removes people who would have submitted a rating.
  • Replying in public raises the rate at which other customers are willing to write.

Getting more reviews is usually treated as a volume problem and is almost always a timing and routing problem. The store sends a request, some people answer, the number goes up slowly, and the obvious next move looks like sending more requests or attaching a bigger incentive to them. Both are the expensive options, and they are rarely the ones that were limiting you. Last updated: September 2026.

Omniconvert has measured how stores collect and display customer feedback across the CROBenchmark dataset of 7,000+ websites in 15+ industries, against 248+ audit criteria, over 13 years in eCommerce. The consistent finding is a distribution problem rather than a demand problem: review volume concentrates on a handful of products while most of the catalogue sits at zero, and the store's total makes that invisible.

What follows is twelve things to do in thirteen weeks, ordered by effort against return. For the underlying machinery, see how to build a Review-Generation system. For the three levers at a general level, see how to get more product reviews.

Start with coverage, not volume

Count the share of products carrying at least five reviews rather than counting reviews. Five is where a product page stops looking untested, and the gains flatten after about twenty. That single change of denominator reorders every tactic below, because it makes routing more valuable than volume.

The reason this matters is that a shopper never meets your total. They meet one product page, and the only number on it that affects them is the one attached to the thing they are considering. A store with a large total and thin coverage is well reviewed in aggregate and untested everywhere it counts.

Concentration happens by default rather than by choice. Requests follow orders, orders follow bestsellers, and the products that most need social proof, the new ones and the long tail, are the ones that receive the fewest requests. Nothing corrects this unless you correct it deliberately.

So the first measurement is the share of active products with five or more reviews. Most stores running a review programme for a year or more are somewhere between fifteen and forty percent, and almost none of them know the figure before they look.

Twelve ways to get more reviews, by effort against return

The first four are free and mostly mechanical. The middle four cost design time. The last four cost money or ongoing effort. Working the list in order means the cheap changes are in place before anyone argues about incentives, which is also the order in which they compound.

1. Ask the customers you never asked. Almost every store has delivered orders from before the programme existed, or from a period when it was broken. A single, clearly worded request to that backlog converts at a lower rate than a fresh request and comes from a vastly larger base. This is the largest one-off win available to most stores and it takes an afternoon.

2. Move the ask to after use. Delivery is the wrong trigger. It collects impressions of the box. Set the gap by category: about a week for a consumable, three to four weeks for a durable good, longer for anything seasonal or occasional.

3. Cut the form to a rating and one optional sentence. Every additional required field removes people. Title fields, category ratings, nickname fields and account creation each take a share of the people who were willing a moment ago.

4. Send one reminder, and only one. A single reminder three to five days later typically adds a third again to the response. A second reminder adds very little and costs goodwill.

5. Route requests to uncovered products. When an order contains several items, ask about the one with the fewest reviews rather than the most expensive one. This is the single biggest change on the list for coverage and almost no store does it.

6. Ask for the photo after the rating, never inside it. Submit first, then offer the photo upload on the thank-you screen. You keep the ratings you would have lost and still collect a useful share of images.

7. Put the request where the customer already is. A request inside the shipping notification or the order-tracking page reaches people who never open marketing email, and it arrives in a message they actually wanted.

8. Use SMS for the reminder, email for the first ask. Email carries the context and produces longer reviews. SMS produces higher response and shorter ones, which is exactly what you want from a reminder.

9. Reply in public to every critical review. This is a volume tactic as well as a service one. A visible reply tells the next reader that a person is on the other end, and willingness to write rises accordingly.

10. Seed new products deliberately. A new product launched into zero reviews stays there. Route the first weeks of requests toward it, and accept that this slows the accumulation on products that do not need more.

11. Ask for reviews of the experience separately from the product. Customers who feel neutral about a product often have something to say about delivery or support, and splitting the two questions recovers responses that a single product question loses.

12. Offer a neutral incentive, last. If the eleven changes above are in place and volume is still short, a small reward for submitting any review, offered to every buyer and disclosed to the reader, is the compliant version. Doing this first, which is what most stores do, buys volume that the free changes would have produced anyway.

What each tactic is actually worth

The cheap items are not the weak ones. Timing, form length and routing repeatedly outperform incentives, and they carry no compliance exposure, no cost per review and no distortion of what gets written. The table sets effort against what each one moves.

The fifth row is the one worth arguing about internally. Routing to uncovered products barely changes your headline number and changes your catalogue, which makes it a hard sell against a dashboard and the right decision anyway.

The four that get skipped

Routing, the post-submission photo ask, the backlog request and public replies. Each is skipped for the same reason: none of them makes the total review count move sharply in a week, and three of the four are worth more over a quarter than anything that does.

Routing is skipped because it is invisible in reporting. The store sends the same number of requests and receives roughly the same number of reviews; they simply land in better places. If your only measure is volume, this looks like work that achieved nothing.

The post-submission photo ask is skipped because the form feels like the natural place to request an image. It is the natural place and it is the expensive one: a photo field inside the form removes people who were about to leave a perfectly good rating.

The backlog request is skipped out of a reasonable-sounding worry that asking about an old purchase is intrusive. In practice a clear, brief, honest request about something a customer bought and kept performs well, and the base is large enough to tolerate a lower rate.

Public replies are skipped because they are ongoing work with no visible attribution. Bain and Company's work with Fred Reichheld holds that a five percent improvement in retention can raise profits by twenty-five to ninety-five percent, and a publicly answered complaint is one of the few cheap interventions that acts on both retention and acquisition at once [Bain and Company].

What a realistic quarter looks like

Weeks one and two for measurement and the backlog request, weeks three to six for timing, form and reminder, weeks seven to ten for routing and photos, the rest for replies and any incentive decision. Volume moves early from the backlog and steadily afterward from the mechanics.

Front-load the one-off. The backlog request is the only item that produces a visible spike, and doing it first buys the patience for the slower items behind it. Measure coverage before you send it so you can see where the spike landed.

Then change the mechanics while that volume is still arriving. Timing, form length and the reminder are all settings rather than projects, and they are the ones whose effect persists after the spike has passed.

Leave routing until the mechanics are stable, because it changes what the numbers mean and you want a clean read on the earlier changes first. Marketing Metrics has long put the probability of selling to an existing customer at roughly sixty to seventy percent against five to twenty percent for a new prospect, which is the real reason to treat this as a retention programme that produces reviews rather than a content programme that produces ratings [Marketing Metrics].

What to do this week

Four actions, none of which need a new tool and all of which can be finished inside five working days. The point is to have the cheap changes live before anyone schedules a meeting about incentives.
  • Measure coverage. The share of active products with five or more reviews. Write the number down before you change anything.
  • Count the un-asked. Delivered orders that never received a request. That number is your one-off opportunity.
  • Cut one field from the form. Whichever is least necessary. Then cut a second one next week.
  • Move the trigger. From delivery to a category-appropriate gap after delivery. This is one setting and it is usually the second-largest change on the list.

Where the harder question is what the reviews are telling you rather than how many you have, that is a sentiment problem. Brandfeel, Omniconvert's sentiment-intelligence layer, aggregates reviews, NPS and support-ticket themes to surface what customers keep saying, and the same signal feeds Nexus by Omniconvert, an AI for eCommerce growth engine that unifies commerce data, ranks experiments by True Profit, and generates campaigns and creative you approve before they go live. To see how your coverage compares with the brands you compete against, the where you stand on reviews guide covers the competitive read.

The bottom line

Almost every store that wants more reviews is capable of getting them without spending anything, because the constraint is rarely willingness. It is that the request arrives too early, asks for too much, and points at a product that already has plenty. Fix those three and the volume arrives on its own, distributed across the catalogue rather than piled onto the products that were already selling. Do the one-off request to the customers nobody ever asked, because it is the largest single win available and it takes an afternoon. Then change the mechanics and leave them alone long enough to see what they did. And keep the target honest: the number that matters is the share of your products a shopper can check before buying, not the number in the footer of your homepage.

© 2026 All rights reserved. 💙 from BrandFeel, built by Omniconvert

TacticEffortMoves volumeMoves coverage
Request to the un-asked backlogOne afternoonLarge, onceModerate
Ask after use, not on deliveryA setting changeModerate, ongoingNone
Shorter formA template editModerate, ongoingNone
One reminderA flow stepModerate, ongoingNone
Route to uncovered productsLogic changeSmallLarge
Photo asked after submissionA screen changeProtects volumeNone
Public replies to critical reviewsOngoing timeSmall, compoundingNone
Neutral incentiveMoney, ongoingModerateSmall
Source: Omniconvert, review-programme tactics by effort and by which target they move